City rankings
Lowest Unemployment in Vermont
Essex Junction ranks #1 in Vermont for lowest unemployment at 1.9%.
This ranking orders all 4 qualifying Vermont cities by unemployment rate, computed from the named federal field or time-series described below. It is one of 9 transparent ranking lenses Areazine publishes for Vermont, each answering one direct question from official data. Compare Essex Junction's standing against every other Vermont city ranked below.
Data updated 2026-08-21
- 4
- Cities ranked
- 1.9%
- #1 Essex Junction
- 4.4%
- Lowest, Rutland
What this Vermont ranking shows
According to the U.S. Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year estimates, the CDC PLACES population-level health analysis, and the CMS Hospital Compare quality data, Areazine ranks U.S. cities across more than 19,000 incorporated places, census-designated places, and consolidated city-county governments. State-level city rankings combine these federal datasets to produce intra-state comparisons across demographics, economics, health outcomes, and hospital quality.
Essex Junction leads 4 Vermont cities at 1.9%, while Rutland sits at the bottom with 4.4% - a total spread of 2.5% on unemployment rate. The top 5 occupy 100% of that range, indicating a wide separation between leaders and the rest of the field.
The median Vermont city in this list sits at 4.3%, 2.4% behind Essex Junction. See our methodology for ranking construction, data vintage, refresh cadence, and the federal upstream tables we join, and triangulate via the 8 other Vermont rankings below, cities that lead on multiple lenses are the most robust signals.
Top 5 - Lowest Unemployment
| Rank | City | unemployment rate | Population |
|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Essex Junction | 1.9% | 10K |
| #2 | South Burlington | 3.9% | 19K |
| #3 | Burlington | 4.3% | 42K |
| #4 | Rutland | 4.4% | 16K |
Does unemployment rate track with city size?
Lowest Unemployment vs. population, top 25 ranked cities
Lowest Unemployment 4
More Vermont Rankings 8
Reading this Vermont ranking responsibly
Single-metric rankings are useful precisely because they are honest about what they measure. A "highest income" ranking does not tell you that the top-ranked city is the best place to live in Vermont; it tells you that, among cities of population ten thousand and above in Vermont that have a published median household income field in the most recent American Community Survey five-year estimates, this city has the highest such value. That precise definition matters, because composite "best places" lists from real-estate marketing sites and lifestyle magazines often combine income with subjective weights on schools, walkability, and amenities, producing a score whose components are not disclosed and whose ordering is not reproducible. Areazine's editorial commitment is to keep the underlying field, source, and vintage visible so the reader can audit any rank in this list against the canonical federal record.
Cross-checking against other rankings is a useful sanity test. A city that appears in the top ten on three or more different rankings, for example, highest income, most educated, and lowest poverty, is showing a robust signal across multiple independent dimensions. A city that appears in the top ten on only one ranking and middling on the others is showing a narrower signal, often driven by a single statistical artifact (a small population pulling the per-capita measure, a recent acquisition spike inflating median home value, an outlier survey year). The other nine Vermont rankings linked above provide that cross-check at zero extra effort.
Data Sources
Population and economic data from the Census Bureau American Community Survey (2024 5-year estimates). Health data from the CDC PLACES (2023). Ranking computations use U.S. Census Bureau reference geographies. Crime statistics, where referenced, originate from the FBI Uniform Crime Reporting program (also accessible via the Crime Data Explorer).
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.